Possibilities of a gender-responsive infrastructure for livelihood-vulnerable women's resilience in rural-coastal Bangladesh
Category:- Journal; Year:- 2022
Discipline:- Architecture Discipline
School:- Science, Engineering & Technology School
Abstract
Purpose – With
the simultaneous increase of natural hazards and land- and resource-vulnerable
women in the rural coasts of Bangladesh, large- and medium-scale infrastructure
and livelihood programmes by government and non-government-organisations have
been plenty. Yet, gender-responsive and livelihood-integrated infrastructure
for these women’s adaptation against increasing coastal vulnerabilities has
been scarce. This paper outlines an infrastructure framework for improving
their livelihood resilience in the scarcity of similar research.
Design/methodology/approach
– A case study approach was assumed for this research. Based on a conceptual
framework, in-depth interviews and focus-group-discussions with vulnerable
women and keyinformant-interview of NGO/government respondents were primarily
used for data collection at Latachapli – a disaster-vulnerable coastal village
in Southwest Bangladesh. Findings were derived primarily through inductive
thematic coding.
Findings – Rural
coastal women’s livelihood vulnerabilities result from the lack of adequate,
spatial/ infrastructural and integrated (socio-economic) facilities and
institutions. There is a clear need for a community-level and gender-responsive
spatio-physical platform to create income generation/livelihood diversification
opportunities irrespective of seasonalities, skill/capacity development and
sharing/networking possibilities.
Research
limitations/implications – Due to case-specificity, research findings are
representative but not generalisable. Further research is needed, especially at
the intersection of gender, inequality and infrastructure design/planning
regarding vulnerable women’s resilience. Practical implications – This proposed
infrastructure framework can be considered for similar disastervulnerable rural
coastal settings as a development policy and a physical infrastructure.
Originality/value –
This case study’s in-depth probing into vulnerable coastal women’s livelihoods contributes
to a growing body of knowledge, highlights their complex needs, and
re-conceptualises genderresponsive infrastructure in similar communities’
sustainable development. Piecemeal funding for social services will be more
effective if coordinated with and allocated to appropriate engineering
infrastructure. With access to proper community facilities and diverse
livelihood opportunities all around the year (in this case, a multipurpose
gender-sensitive infrastructure), communities would be more empowered to self-organise
and support each other in delivering necessary soft services.